Tracy Bourgon, content writer at Tracenable, holds an MSc in environmental sciences. Passionate about art and nature, she combines expertise and creativity to inspire positive change for the planet.
Climate Targets
In an era where ESG data reporting is a business imperative, a stark reality emerges: only 10% of companies can accurately measure their carbon emissions, according to a 2023 study by Boston Consulting Group (BCG). This gap between reporting and precise measurement underscores a critical challenge: companies must bridge this
GHG Emissions
In today's data-driven sustainability landscape, one metric stands out as a critical indicator of corporate environmental impact: Scope 2 emissions. As companies worldwide race to achieve ambitious net-zero targets, understanding and managing these indirect energy emissions has become more crucial than ever. Did you know that for many
EU Taxonomy
As sustainability transforms finance and investment, there is growing demand for a framework that clearly distinguishes genuinely sustainable activities from greenwashing. The EU Taxonomy answers this need, providing a standardized system that defines which economic activities qualify as “sustainable” under specific, science-based criteria. Developed by the European Union, the Taxonomy
GHG Emissions
Did you know that Scope 1 emissions—also known as direct emissions—account for over 30% of a company’s total carbon footprint in some industries? As global efforts intensify to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Scope 1 data has become essential within ESG data frameworks because they represent direct
GHG Emissions
Tackling climate change starts with understanding where emissions come from. But with emissions originating from so many sources, how do companies begin to track, manage, and reduce their environmental impact? This is where Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions come into play. These categories provide a framework within ESG data